The Road To 100

May 25, 2010

Against People Who Read?

Filed under: Observation — coachbogey @ 2:54 PM
Tags: , , , ,

I don’t hate the library! 

Farmer's market on the town common

I knew it was just a matter of time.  Even in a small town of 4,600 people, decisions are to be made which will please some people and upset others.  I just didn’t think the library budget would be the spark that fires up people.  

I have heard from a number of concerned citizens of Paxton about my calling for a cut in the library’s budget.  My neighbor stopped me in my driveway to express her anger over what the paper had reported about my input on the library budget.  I tried to explain to her why I felt the budget was too high, but she didn’t want any part of it.  Her reaction, along with the phone calls I have received, makes me think I need to explain. 

Budget season in town politics is hectic.  The town is going to raise a limited amount of money which will be divided among the many department budgets.  Each department head submits a requested budget in December to the Town Administrator.  The Town Administrator then compiles the budget proposals into notebooks for each selectman.  Then, one-by-one, each department head comes before the Board, and later the Finance Committee, to defend their proposed budgets. 

There is a lot to learn for a new selectman, but even I know that in a tough economy we can’t afford to give more money to a department than requested.  This is exactly what happened in the case of the library.  Allow me to explain. 

I was elected as a selectman on January 19th.  After attending my first select board meeting, I was told by an experienced selectman that I should attend a Finance Committee meeting to help me get up to speed on the budget process in town.  On February 3rd I attended the scheduled Finance Committee meeting.  Sitting unacknowledged in the back of the room, I watched as the Finance Committee questioned the Council on Aging representative about their budget, then spent time going over the various DPW budgets with the head of the DPW.  The committee ended the interviewing by examining the Tree Warden’s budget.  The Tree Warden worked hard to defend his budget request, stating that with hanging limbs, leaning trees, and many stumps near public roadways, he needed to spend some money to ensure public safety.  The Finance Committee Chairman explained that public safety is very important, but with the budget as tough as it is, a risk/reward approach is needed.  The questioning was quite tough and in depth. 

After the questioning ended, the Finance Committee proceeded to approve the Animal Control budget, the Library budget, and the Historical Commission budget with little discussion.  By the end of the evening I had taken four pages of notes and had learned a lot, leaving while thinking I wish I had been permitted to ask questions. 

OK…OK…What’s the point. 

On February 16th it was the select board’s turn to examine, among others, the library budget.  The library representatives sat before us explaining why they felt a level funded budget of $148,786 was what the library needed.  They explained that at this figure, the library would not meet the MAR (Municipal Appropriation Requirement), but would be able to secure a waiver.  To meet this requirement, a municipality must appropriate 2.5% more than the average of the previous three years’ library budget.  If the town cannot meet this requirement, then the town may apply for a state waiver.  This would allow the library to remain certified which means that Paxton residents would still be permitted to borrow books from other libraries that may not be available in Paxton. 

The library is requesting $148,786, yet at the Finance Committee meeting the committee approved a library budget of $155,420.  I mentioned this to the other board members but was dismissed by the Town Administrator when he asked, “Why would the Finance Committee approve a budget of more than what was requested?”  I stated that I didn’t know, but that is what I had written down.  Anyway, we voted to approve the library’s requested budget of $148,786. 

Fast forward to the reconciliation meeting.  This meeting is a Finance Committee meeting that the selectboard is invited to attend.  The purpose is to reconcile the two budgets so that one town budget will be presented to the town at town meeting.  Things went smoothly until we got to the library budget.  At this point, I mentioned that the library had request a budget of $148,786 and yet the FINCOM had approved a higher number.  With the town looking at taking money from the town’s stabilization fund to balance the budget, the selectmen recommended that the library budget be approved at the requested amount, not the higher FINCOM amount.  At this point the FINCOM chair informed us that a mistake had been made by the library personnel when they met with us and that the FINCOM number was the correct number.  When the selectboard questioned how, the FINCOM argued for the higher number, making it clear that at this time they were not interested in revising their figure.  After some intense discussion, the selectboard reluctantly agreed to accept the FINCOM number with the assurance that if the town budget needed to be adjusted, this was the first budget to be changed. 

Paxton roads the day after the ice storm of 2008.

The April 26th selectboard meeting brought the news that the Finance Committee had further cut the black top item of the DPW budget by another $15,000 so as to reduce the amount of money needed to take from the town’s stabilization fund.  I spoke up and said that it was a good idea to not take too much from stabilization since state experts are predicting the next fiscal year to be much worse than this year.  I then said that the FINCOM should consider reducing the library budget to the amount they had requested.  

Next day, the Worcester Telegram reports I want to cut the library budget.  Nothing could be further from the truth.  I just wanted to fund the library budget at the requested amount, not a higher figure.  The Highway Department, which has a direct bearing on public safety, received $169,575 (30%) less than they had requested, but the library budget ultimately received recommended funding of $9,223 (6%) more than requested. 

This didn’t sound right to me, but judging by people’s reaction I must admit…

I was wrong.

May 12, 2010

Defining Leadership

The passage of the new immigration law in Arizona has brought forth two schools of leadership presently guiding cities, states, and yes, even our country.

As anyone not living in a comatose state for the past few weeks has heard, Arizona has passed new immigration legislation.  The law came as a result of kidnappings and home invasions which have become the norm in Arizona for years.  Phoenix is now second in the world for the number of kidnappings for ransom per year, only Mexico City has more.  Last year alone, Phoenix had over 370 reported kidnappings.  Many of the kidnap victims are tortured, returning with missing hands or fingers that have been crushed.  It is hard to imagine a city within the United States being second in the world for such a dangerous and violent crime.

Arizona lawmakers decided that they needed to step up and do something to rein in the rampant crime in their state.  They passed legislation that mirrors the federal immigration laws.  The legislation states that if local authorities detain a person for a crime, and there is a reason to suspect the person may be in the country illegally, then they are to investigate the status of the individual.  The law simply allows the local authorities to enforce the laws that the federal authorities haven’t.

Then came the protests.  It started with Cardinal Roger Mahoney, Roman Catholic Archbishop of Los Angeles, in a blog post dated April 18, 2010.  He states,

“The tragedy of the law is its totally flawed reasoning: that immigrants come to our country to rob, plunder, and consume public resources. That is not only false, the premise is nonsense.” 

The only tragedy here is that Cardinal Mahoney doesn’t actually write about what is reflected in the law.  The law is aimed at illegal immigration, not immigrants in general.  Immigration is one of the ingredients that has gone into making the United States a great country.  I hope people aren’t against immigration, my hope is that people will see the value of cracking down on illegal immigration.  The two, legal immigration versus illegal immigration, actually have very little to do with one another.

The Cardinal goes on to write about the new law impeding our ability to fill the labor pool in the United States in the coming years.  One can only assume that the Cardinal is unaware of the 10% unemployment rate among legal residents of our country.  Besides that, and the rant about Arizona “reverting to German Nazi and Russian Communist techniques whereby people are required to turn one another in to the authorities on any suspicion of documentation,” which is not anywhere in the legislation, there was a line that struck me.  The Cardinal writes,

 ”I have met so many of our immigrant families and I am in awe at their love for our country, their care and concern for their children, and their resourcefulness in helping to improve our communities, our way of life, and our economic future.”

Doesn’t it strike anyone as rather odd that a person with such a deep love for our nation would begin their life in this country be breaking some of its laws?  One would think that a person with such a love for the United States would want to come in legally, proudly, and respecting the laws of the nation for which they proclaim such love.

Since the Cardinal’s blog piece, I have read of protests from coast-to-coast.  Cities from San Diego to Boston have voted to boycott Arizona because of the this new law.  Boston’s mayor went so far as to say,

Mayor Tom Menino: “It is so outrageous at this time in our county’s history.”

Boston Mayor Tom Menino says the city has a million dollar contract with a software company in Arizona called N-Focus. The mayor told NECN that he is drafting a letter to the company to find out if its execs support the new Arizona law.

Mayor Tom Menino: “If they don’t agree with my position, we are gonna have to take some legal action, it is a million dollar contract, it is a great program of tracking our young people, but if this company is going to discriminate against anyone, they are not going to do it on my dime.” (emphasis added)

So, Mr. Mayor, if someone does not agree with your position, then they are not allowed to do business with the City of Boston. 

Of course, the President of the United States has chimed in by saying,

President Obama suggested today that the immigration bill expected to be signed into law in Arizona is a “misguided” piece of legislation that “threatened to undermine basic notions of fairness that we cherish as Americans, as well as the trust between police and their communities that is so crucial to keeping us safe. “

Ask the people of Phoenix how that is working for them, Mr. President.

Even Mexico is unhappy with the new law in Arizona.  According to the AP,

Mexico’s Foreign Relations Department said in a statement relayed through Mexico’s U.S. embassy that it viewed the measure with great concern and said it “could have potentially serious effects on the civil rights” of Mexican nationals.

Mexican nationals here legally will be just fine, Mexican nationals here illegally and committing crimes however….

Take a minute and try to come up with the one thing that is missing in all these condemnations of the immigration legislation in Arizona.  Seriously, before you read on, try to figure out what is missing.  Go back and read the links if that will help.

Give up?

The one thing that is missing from the sea of criticism is what is lacking from many of our leaders in America.  None of the above is offering a solution.  Condemn Arizona?  “Absolutely!”  Offer a solution?  “Uh…Well…No, but I think what they are doing is wrong!” 

Isn’t it amazing how people thousands of miles away can turn their backs on the legal citizens of Arizona, in support for illegal aliens, but none have offered to help.  Arizona’s crime rate is through the roof.  Most of us cannot imagine living in or near a city where there is a kidnapping rate greater than one per day!  Most of America has no idea what it’s like to live in a city where it is unsafe to go out, day or night.  These are the things that the people of Arizona deal with each and every day.  Meanwhile, cities across the country line up to boycott the businesses owned by legal residents of the State of Arizona, further hurting fellow Americans who truly do love their country.

Well Cardinal Mahoney, any ideas?  How about you, Mr. Mayor?  Mr. President, what do you suggest?  That’s what I thought, the definition of modern leadership, tear down others’ ideas without bringing anything to the table yourself.  I know very little about the Governor of Arizona, Jan Brewer, but I do know that even with the mountain of criticism facing her, she stepped up and is trying to do something to solve a big problem in her state.  Other leaders would do well to follow her lead in their own jurisdictions.

By the way, as leaders stand back and criticize, almost three-quarters of Americans support the provision of the new Arizona law that requires people to produce documents verifying they are in the U.S. legally.

Madame Governor, your actions are displaying true leadership.

**UPDATE  Further confirmation that the Feds won’t allow the facts get in the way of a good arguement when it comes to the new immigration law in Arizona.  Eric Holder, the United States Attorney General, has been very critical of Arizona’s new immigration law, going so far as to state that the United States is considering challenging the new law in court.  There is only one problem with his critique of the legislation, he hasn’t actually read the ten pages that constitute the law yet.  The video below is less than four minutes long but must be seen.

May 7, 2010

Happy Mothers’ Day

Filed under: Observation,Reflections — coachbogey @ 1:21 PM
Tags: ,

For all my readers who are moms, happy Mothers’ Day!  Enjoy!

Theme: Rubric. Blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 32 other followers