The Road To 100

June 25, 2009

Farrah Fawcett’s Passing

A great individual has passed away.

farrah-fawcettFarrah Fawcett, the 1970′s icon, passed away this morning.  Farrah rose to fame in the 1970s during her one year stint as Jill Munroe on the TV show “Charlie’s Angels.”  After “Charlie’s Angels” Farrah stayed in public view with one of the best selling posters of all time, selling over 12 million copies.  Her flowing blond hair, perfect smile, and bathing suit clad body found their way to the walls of many teenagers’ rooms, including yours truly.  She then embarked on a film career that led to many Emmy and Golden Globe nominations.  Farrah also managed to keep herself in full public view by posing in Playboy Magazine in 1995 at the age of 50.  Farrah’s cover installment of Playboy is the magazine’s top selling issue of the 1990s.

None of the previously stated work, in my opinion, makes her a great individual.

Instead, that for which I will best remember Farrah Fawcett is a television special that aired on May 15th of this year called “Farrah’s Story.”  “Farrah’s Story” was filmed using a home video recorder and narrated by the actress herself.  Unlike other films featuring the blond bombshell from Texas, this production is Farrah’s video diary as she undergoes treatments in her battle against anal cancer.  The film follows her back-and-forth to Germany as she endures various agonizing procedures, exposing herself as no pictorial ever could.  Some critics pointed out that the film showed how the wealthy have the advantage to aggressively seek out the most cutting edge treatments available anywhere in the world.  They used her film to expose problems with health care and felt no sympathy for a rich starlet grasping at one last shot of limelight.  One comment after a review of the two hour show in the New York Times said, “A cancer patient’s ‘reality show’ struck me as demeaning and – I’m sorry – ego-ridden.”  I think some may have missed a deeper message, whether that message was intentional or not.

Farrah said she filmed “Farrah’s Story” to bring to light a lesser known cancer and the struggles to fight it.  She does accomplish this somewhat, but then she does so much more. 

First, cancer will touch almost everyone in some way.  Many will actually have their own personal battle with the dreaded ailment.  Others will have a family member, friend, or an acquaintance who will face a cancer diagnosis.  For many in the latter group, we will hear of the fight but never actually get to be with the patient on the front line of the war.  Farrah brought us to the fight.  Her reporting included footage of the atrocities of the disease, not just statistics or pictures of cancer victims.  I remember watching my closest friend as he slowly succumbed to pancreatic cancer.  I sat in the hospital, feeding this once proud, robust man spoonfuls of jello.  I witnessed my friend wasting away as the cancer and the treatments attacked his body and soul.  Even with this experience, “Farrah’s Story” was able to provide me with a deeper understanding of the struggles cancer patients endure each day.

Second, the film tore away the image of the beauty queen and reminded us Farrah was so much more than a photograph on a wall or a character on the screen.  For many, the attributes of the characters portrayed by the stars become the attributes of the stars themselves.  Farrah opened herself up and reminded all of us that Hollywood is not Mount Olympus and that fame and fortune does not make anyone immortal.  Make no mistake, it is certainly understandable that many was the star who hid in seclusion at the onset of illness rather than allow themselves to be seen as anyone less than the characters they once brought to life.  Farrah did not do this, instead our final images of the beauty queen will be of her bald head and vomiting from a reaction to medication.

Finally, and for me as a girls’ basketball coach most importantly, Farrah displayed an inner strength of which few knew.  Throughout the film we are shown a woman who was once on top of the world now taking her lumps like anyone else.  I watched in horror as Farrah faced numerous painful procedures, dealt with sickness as well as the side effects, and rode a roller coaster of positive and negative prognosis.  Through it all, Farrah never lost her dignity nor her zest for life.  She remained determined to chronicle her struggles and reminded us that even a one time pinup girl can muster quite a fight.  More than once I found myself questioning my own ability to find the strength and courage Farrah displayed if God forbid I was ever put in her position.

I will always remember the Farrah Fawcett that appeared on that great poster back in the 70s.  The beautiful crime fighter in “Charlie’s Angels” will always be a part of my memory.  But it is the Farrah Fawcett I watched in “Farrah’s Story” that I will always most admire.

That is why I say, a great individual has passed away.

 

If you wish to see “Farrah’s Story,” click here.

June 24, 2009

What Happened to Freedom of the Press?

Filed under: Observation — coachbogey @ 5:30 AM
Tags: , , , , ,

Freedom of PressFrom state run television to staged press conferences, we are getting the change we were promised.

The White House has acknowledged that two questions from the most recent Presidential News Conference were prearranged by White House officials.  First, a story of presidential basketball from the Washington Times here and then a story from the Washington Post here.  These stories are adding to the uneasy feeling in the pit of my stomach of which I have previously written.

Can we still trust the press to deliver the news?

June 16, 2009

State Run Television

I’m really not getting nervous, yet.

I read the Drudge Report everyday.  The Drudge Report is a news site that averages 25 million hits a day.  Basically, Drudge sets up links to news from worldwide sources.  Some of it is hard news, such as keeping up with the volatility of North Korea.  Lighter reports might include news from England that fish, despite having small brains, are capable of learning.  Drudge has even broken stories on their own, such as the President Clinton – Monica Lewinsky affair.  Basically, Drudge is a comprehensive sight that changes constantly as it tries to keep up with news from around the planet.

Today I read something that took me by surprise.  ABC will turnover its programming on June 24th to President Obama.  According to an ABC release, ABC news anchor Charlie Gibson will deliver the “news” from the Blue Room of the White House.  Following the news will be an ABC prime time special titled “Questions For The President:  Prescription For America,” a health care reform “town hall” featuring President Obama.  A special edition of “Primetime” will also air from the White House at 10 PM ET.  ABC also announced that “Good Morning America,” “World News,” “Nightline,” and ABCNews.com’s “Top Line” will all feature “special programming on the president’s health care agenda.”

abcThe report adds that President Obama will be interviewed exclusively on “Good Morning America” by Diane Sawyer.  The morning show will also feature a Robin Roberts interview with Michelle Obama.

That is a lot of television time dedicated to selling the 1.6 trillion dollar health care reform proposal being bounced around on Capitol Hill.  This question comes to mind:  Will the state run television network (for a day anyway) allow opposing viewpoints to air?  The answer apparently is no.  I know people are still angry at George Bush, the president who left office six months ago, so quoting Republicans is dangerous ground, but the GOP chief of staff has sent the following letter to ABC News president David Westin:

Dear Mr. Westin:

As the national debate on health care reform intensifies, I am deeply concerned and disappointed with ABC’s astonishing decision to exclude opposing voices on this critical issue on June 24, 2009. Next Wednesday, ABC News will air a primetime health care reform “town hall” at the White House with President Barack Obama. In addition, according to an ABC News report, GOOD MORNING AMERICA, WORLD NEWS, NIGHTLINE and ABC’s web news “will all feature special programming on the president’s health care agenda.” This does not include the promotion, over the next 9 days, the president’s health care agenda will receive on ABC News programming.

Today, the Republican National Committee requested an opportunity to add our Party’s views to those of the President’s to ensure that all sides of the health care reform debate are presented. Our request was rejected. I believe that the President should have the ability to speak directly to the America people. However, I find it outrageous that ABC would prohibit our Party’s opposing thoughts and ideas from this national debate, which affects millions of ABC viewers.

In the absence of opposition, I am concerned this event will become a glorified infomercial to promote the Democrat agenda. If that is the case, this primetime infomercial should be paid for out of the DNC coffers. President Obama does not hold a monopoly on health care reform ideas or on free airtime. The President has stated time and time again that he wants a bipartisan debate. Therefore, the Republican Party should be included in this primetime event, or the DNC should pay for your airtime.

Respectfully,
Ken McKay
Republican National Committee
Chief of Staff

Then the director of the National Media Research Center, Rich Noyes, added that if ABC claims fairness in its presentation with the amount of time dedicated exclusively to the president’s platform then the network may have a problem.

Says Mr. Noyes, “Will the opponents of President Obama’s health care plan get an equal shot at the debate on the airwaves? This is an awful lot of time that ABC is giving over to one side of the debate.  This is an issue of such importance, the public really requires a balanced debate.”

ABC News Senior Vice President Kerry Smith responded to the Republican’s complaints:

“ABCNEWS prides itself on covering all sides of important issues and asking direct questions of all newsmakers — of all political persuasions — even when others have taken a more partisan approach and even in the face of criticism from extremes on both ends of the political spectrum. ABCNEWS is looking for the most thoughtful and diverse voices on this issue.

“ABCNEWS alone will select those who will be in the audience asking questions of the president. Like any programs we broadcast, ABC News will have complete editorial control. To suggest otherwise is quite unfair to both our journalists and our audience.”

Of course the voices will be thoughtful and diverse, state run television always is.  ABC has turned over hours of broadcast time to the President of the United States to sell his health care reform while turning away the opposition.  As Drudge writes,

“The network plans a prime time special — ‘Prescription for America’ — originating from the East Room, exclude opposing voices on the debate.”

By the way, the Director of Communications at the White House Office of Health Reform is Linda Douglass.  Ms. Douglass previously worked as a reporter for…  ABCNews.

State run television making me nervous?  Not yet, but I do have an uneasy feeling in the pit of my stomach.

 

Update!  An organization called “Conservatives for Patients’ Rights” report that they have requested from ABC the rates to purchase advertising before President Obama’s television special on June 24th, but have been told that no issue related advertising will be allowed by the network.  What is important here is not that a request for rebuttal has been denied by ABC, but a paid issue related advertisement will not be permitted during the show.

And ABC expects us to believe that they are “looking for the most thoughtful and diverse voices on this issue?”

The uneasy feeling in my stomach is getting worse.

June 10, 2009

Frightening Moment

The odds are obviously slim.

Moments ago I was enjoying a sandwich and a Sam Adams when I happened to catch a glimpse at the TV over the bar.  There was a headline flashed on the screen about a shooting at the Holocaust Museum in Washington.  The report went on the mention that there were conflicting reports about how many people were injured.

My youngest son, Sam, is on a four day field trip to Washington D.C.

I quickly put down my sandwich and called the school.  The secretary at the school told me that they were unaware of the shooting that had just taken place.  She reassured me that the group was not going to be going to the Holocaust Museum and that the students should be fine.  She told me she would get confirmation from the principal.

Shortly after my call to the school, a recorded automated message was sent out via telephone (reverse 911) that the students were not at the location of the shooting and all students are fine.

Just want to give a quick shout out to the school for their quick action in informing parents that the students were not in the area.  When it comes to technology in the schools, the ability to have a reverse 911 message go out to all parents almost instantaneously may be the most important.

Now I am waiting to speak to Sam.

June 3, 2009

Crime and Punishment

Filed under: Observation — coachbogey @ 2:00 PM
Tags: , , , , , ,

…The would be victim then drew a gun in self-defense.

I want you to imagine for a moment that you are at home late one evening.  You look next door at the neighbor’s house and notice that someone has broken into the home and is in the process of burglarizing it.  You go to a closet, pull out a shotgun, and dial 911.  What do you do next?  This is exactly where Mr. Joe Horn found himself back in 2007.  He decided, despite pleas from the dispatcher to stay in his house, to go outside and take matters in his own hands.  The 911 call is below. 

A crime foiled.

Then there is the case of the druggist from Oklahoma City.  As two young men were holding up a drugstore on May 19, Jerome Ersland drew a gun from behind the counter and shot one of the robbers in the head.  He then chased the other robber, who had fled after the gunshot, out the door.  He fired two shots at the robber he was chasing.  Fifteen seconds later, Mr. Ersland returns to the store and walks behind the counter.  He takes another gun out of a drawer and walks to the man lying on the floor and shoots the wounded man five more times in the abdomen.  Mr. Ersland then returns the gun to the drawer and picks up the phone to contact police.  The raw store surveillance video is below.

A crime foiled.

I must make one thing clear, I am not against people having guns.  I believe that people should have the right to protect themselves against those that would bring harm upon them or their families.  Guns can be a very effective way to defend oneself. The problem with both of the above stories is that both men shot the criminals despite not being in harm’s way. 

Mr. Horn did not need to go outside, but the fact that he was armed gave him the confidence to go out and confront the people breaking into his neighbor’s house.  He was told repeatedly by the dispatcher to stay put, not to leave his house.  He was not in any imminent danger. 

Mr. Ersland was probably right to shoot the young man the first time in the head, after all the 16 year-old’s accomplice was armed.  But when Mr. Ersland, an army vet and familiar with guns, returns and shoots the unarmed and unconscious man five more times, he clearly crossed a line. 

Both men are being hailed for their efforts by people.  At Mr. Ersland’s bail hearing, a lawyer argued that while on bail Mr. Ersland should be allowed to have complete access to firearms.  The fact that Mr. Ersland is currently out on $100,000 bail that a supporter posted on his behalf should come as no surprise, but the fact that it was the prosecuting attorney who argued for Mr. Ersland’s right to continue to bear arms does shock me.

One more story.

A convenience store owner on Long Island is confronted by a thief wielding a bat.  The thief demands money from the clerk, but is caught by surprise when Mohammad Sohail pulls out a shotgun.  The thief immediately drops to his knees, and while crying begs for his life.  The clerk comes from around the counter, points the gun directly at the criminal, and… Well, watch for yourself. 

A crime foiled.

Mr. Sohail, thanks for the demonstration on how to properly use a gun!

Theme: Rubric. Blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.